Arvid Nordquist vs Mateo Bivol Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 21 Oct at 10:16 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
A. Nordquist vs M. Bivol

SWE
1
Win
Played
0
Win

FRA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Nordquist 1 - 0 Bivol
They have played 3 sets in total, with Arvid Nordquist winning 2 and Mateo Bivol winning 1. The last match between Arvid Nordquist and Mateo Bivol was at the M15 Monastir, 21-10-2025, Round: Q3, Surface: Hard, with Arvid Nordquist getting the victory 6-4 3-6 10-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Nordquist | 1 |
| Bivol | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(Q3) M15 Monastir(10-21-25)
A. Nordquist vs M. Bivol H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 50.55% (137-134) | Career Total W/L | 50.00% (13-13) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
A. Nordquist vs M. Bivol Match Preview:
- How does second serve performance impact match predictions? Arvid Nordquist currently has the edge, winning 47.37% of points on their second serve compared to Mateo Bivol's 41.13%, indicating a possible advantage.
- Looking at return game stats, Arvid Nordquist is stronger on opponents' second serves with a success rate of 52.70%, while Mateo Bivol captures 47.32%. However, Bivol has a slight lead on first serve returns at 29.80% against Nordquist's 26.21%.
- In pressure situations, Nordquist tends to be more resilient, saving 53.13% of breakpoints, compared to Bivol's 45.00%, suggesting a higher mental toughness under pressure.
- When examining overall performance, Mateo Bivol has a better win record over the past year, securing victory in 59.09% of matches, surpassing Nordquist's 50.00%.
- The best surface for each player shows Nordquist prefers clay with a 51% win rate, whereas Bivol performs best on hard courts, also with a 51% win rate.
- Both players primarily compete in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, but Bivol has a greater win percentage at this level, 59.09%, compared to Nordquist's 52.38%.
- Looking at the quality of opponents faced, Bivol has played against higher-ranked opponents with an average rank of 103.64, versus Nordquist's 269.05, offering Bivol more exposure to challenging competition.
- If the match reaches a deciding set, Bivol holds a tactical advantage, having won 40% of such sets compared to Nordquist's 20% in the past year.
- Being mindful of each player's performance in the current event can offer insights, though historical data provides substantial predictive power.
Editorial Prediction (October 21, 2025, UTC):
Analyzing recent second-serve performance, Arvid Nordquist demonstrates a stronger hold, providing an edge over Mateo Bivol. Nordquist’s ability to win nearly half of the second serve points bolsters their likelihood of controlling their service games.
On the return game front, Nordquist maintains an upper hand on second serves, yet Bivol surprises with a better percentage on first serve returns. This creates a mixed battlefield where the service game could have decisive moments influenced by Nordquist's higher breakpoint save rate.
Matching general performance over the past year, Mateo Bivol shows a superior win record showcasing consistency at a slightly higher level of competition. The experience against higher-ranked players suggests additional readiness under pressure.
Considering surface preferences, each player shines on different terrains, yet the current event’s surface might favor neither player's best past statistics.
Ultimately, Mateo Bivol seems the more likely contender to emerge victorious, given a broader exposure to tougher matches, a higher overall match success rate, and resilience in deciding sets.
Arvid Nordquist vs Mateo Bivol Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
A. Nordquist vs M. Bivol H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 19 | Games Won | 13 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 1:42:29 | Average Match Time | 1:42:29 |
| 84% (53/63) | 1st Serve % | 70% (46/66) |
| 72% (38/53) | 1st Serve Win % | 72% (33/46) |
| 50% (5/10) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (10/20) |
| 20% (1/5) | Break Pts Won % | 50% (1/2) |
| 35% (23/66) | Return Points Win % | 32% (20/63) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
A. Nordquist Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
QF | L | 6-3 1-2 ret. | ||
R2 | W | 6-3 6-2 | ||
R1 | W | 6-2 6-3 | ||
R1 | L | 7-6(3) 4-6 6-1 | ||
Q3 | W | 6-4 3-6 10-3 | ||
M. Bivol Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | L | 4-6 6-4 10-4 | ||
Q3 | L | 6-4 3-6 10-3 | ||
Q2 | W | 6-1 6-3 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-0 6-3 | ||
Q3 | L | 7-6(4) 6-4 | ||

A. Nordquist vs M. Bivol Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 50.55% (137/134) | YTD Win/Loss | 52.00% (13/12) |
| 51.61% (305/286) | Sets Win/Loss | 54.39% (31/26) |
| 51.82% (2800/2603) | Games Win/Loss | 53.27% (293/257) |
| 50.74% (69/67) | Hard Win/Loss | 53.33% (8/7) |
| 51.49% (52/49) | Clay Win/Loss | 57.14% (4/3) |
| 47.06% (16/18) | Indoor Hard W/L | 33.33% (1/2) |
| 0.1 | Aces Per Game | 0.09 |
| 268 | Aces Total | 25 |
| 0.15 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.17 |
| 388 | Total Double Faults | 47 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 351.35 | Average Opponent Rank | 126.36 |
| 66% (6005/9088) | 1st Serve % | 61% (530/863) |
| 64% (3838/6005) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (357/530) |
| 48% (1492/3083) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (162/333) |
| 44% (365/825) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 39% (35/89) |
| 39% (3462/8963) | Return Points Win % | 41% (372/905) |
| 25.00% (1/3) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 50.94% (136/131) | Futures W/L | 52.00% (13/12) |
| 52% (136/263) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 52% (13/25) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 46% (25/54) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 60% (3/5) |
| 44% (24/55) | Deciding Set Win % | 29% (2/7) |
| 88% (147/129) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (14/12) |
| 12% (147/18) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (14/2) |
| 6% (124/8) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 9% (11/1) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips

Simona Waltert vs Solana Sierra Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group C – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

Linda Noskova vs Antonia Ruzic Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group D – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

Iga Swiatek vs Gabriela Lee Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group B – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

Carlos Alcaraz vs Jannik Sinner Prediction – ATP Nitto ATP Finals – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

Ella Seidel vs Hanne Vandewinkel Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group F – 16th November 2025 Best Bets
